ابحث في الدعم

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Header is different depending on the transmission method

  • 2 (ردّان اثنان)
  • 1 has this problem
  • 1 view
  • آخر ردّ كتبه chibi_bob

more options

Please lend your power of everyone.

【1】 Submit since the creation of a new message 【2】 Send to re-edited by copying to the Drafts folder, the message in the Sent folder

When sending a message in a method 1 and 2 described above, the header is different to the Why?

In the case of 【1】 Content-Type: image/png;

name="test.png"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <part1.09040409.08050907@test.com> Content-Disposition: inline;

filename="test.png"

In the case of 【2】 Content-Type: image/png Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <part1.04080500.01020700@test.com>

Please lend your power of everyone. 【1】 Submit since the creation of a new message 【2】 Send to re-edited by copying to the Drafts folder, the message in the Sent folder When sending a message in a method 1 and 2 described above, the header is different to the Why? In the case of 【1】 Content-Type: image/png; name="test.png" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <part1.09040409.08050907@test.com> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="test.png" In the case of 【2】 Content-Type: image/png Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <part1.04080500.01020700@test.com>

الحل المُختار

seriously is it relevant? I can see no reason why anyone else would care, but as it is a new message your referring to (only new messages can be in the drafts folder) then I see nothing at all wrong with the internal content parts of the message changing

Read this answer in context 👍 0

All Replies (2)

more options

الحل المُختار

seriously is it relevant? I can see no reason why anyone else would care, but as it is a new message your referring to (only new messages can be in the drafts folder) then I see nothing at all wrong with the internal content parts of the message changing

more options

Thanks for your answer. That the English translation can not be well, to understand your answer seems to be difficult. I am sorry.