Søg i Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Læs mere

Do I need to update Firefox if I run Waterfor?

  • 2 svar
  • 3 har dette problem
  • 1 visning
  • Seneste svar af NancyTrix

more options

I run Waterfox (just updated). When I look at plug-ins, add-ons, etc., the website says Firefox is not up to date. Do I need to update Firefox as well as Waterfox?

I run Waterfox (just updated). When I look at plug-ins, add-ons, etc., the website says Firefox is not up to date. Do I need to update Firefox as well as Waterfox?

Valgt løsning

Waterfox may look like Firefox to many sites because of the way it reports its identity. In this post, your browser sent:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.1.0 Waterfox/40.1.0

By comparison, Firefox (32-bit) sends:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0

So many sites probably overlook the Waterfox part.

If you use Firefox it should update itself, or you can use Help > About Firefox to trigger an update check. But if you aren't using Firefox, there's no urgent need to update it.

I don't know why Waterfox is so far behind in updates, though...

Læs dette svar i sammenhæng 👍 2

Alle svar (2)

more options

Valgt løsning

Waterfox may look like Firefox to many sites because of the way it reports its identity. In this post, your browser sent:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/40.1.0 Waterfox/40.1.0

By comparison, Firefox (32-bit) sends:

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0

So many sites probably overlook the Waterfox part.

If you use Firefox it should update itself, or you can use Help > About Firefox to trigger an update check. But if you aren't using Firefox, there's no urgent need to update it.

I don't know why Waterfox is so far behind in updates, though...

more options

Thank you. I wonder why Waterfox doesn't drop the Firefox part from its identification. That might stop the confusion other sites (and people) have.