Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Weitere Informationen

How to use system GTK3 theme in Firefox 102 ESR?

  • 2 Antworten
  • 1 hat dieses Problem
  • 8 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von -

more options

Setting `widget.non-native-theme.enabled` to false no longer works; I still get Firefox's default styling for controls and widgets.

I use a custom GTK3 theme in my environment that I want to apply to Firefox. The above setting works in 91 ESR, and broke with the upgrade to 102 ESR.

A custom user chrome stylesheet would be too painful.

Note: You can revert page styling to defaults in View -> Page Style -> No Style.

102.1.0esr, Debian testing, Xfce 4.16

Setting `widget.non-native-theme.enabled` to false no longer works; I still get Firefox's default styling for controls and widgets. I use a custom GTK3 theme in my environment that I want to apply to Firefox. The above setting works in 91 ESR, and broke with the upgrade to 102 ESR. A custom user chrome stylesheet would be too painful. Note: You can revert page styling to defaults in View -> Page Style -> No Style. 102.1.0esr, Debian testing, Xfce 4.16

Ausgewählte Lösung

See the discussion in this bug report.

  • 1749645 - Various scrollbar drawing and theme clean-ups.

(please do not comment in bug reports
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
)

Diese Antwort im Kontext lesen 👍 1

Alle Antworten (2)

more options

Ausgewählte Lösung

See the discussion in this bug report.

  • 1749645 - Various scrollbar drawing and theme clean-ups.

(please do not comment in bug reports
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
)

Geändert am von cor-el

more options

Interesting. Maybe it was deprecated for the better.

I was thinking of Firefox adapting styles from the GTK theme CSS file to their own browser styles, or something like that.

So I guess for now it's a no.