Avatar for Username

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Ce sujet de discussion a été archivé. Veuillez poser une nouvelle question si vous avez besoin d’aide.

Debugger source list pane not organized by directory

  • 2 réponses
  • 1 a ce problème
  • 1 vue
  • Dernière réponse par sammmuel

sammmuel
sammmuel
more options

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane

Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome.

Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome. Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux
Captures d’écran jointes

Solution choisie

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!

Lire cette réponse dans son contexte 👍 0

Toutes les réponses (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I see this feature in the current Nightly build (56.0a1), so you will have to wait until this lands in the Developer Edition.

The documents on the MDN website usually reflect the state of the latest Nightly builds version and not all features may be present in other releases.

sammmuel
sammmuel Auteur de la question
more options

Solution choisie

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!