Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Subfolders with unread mail not shown in bold

  • 3 réponses
  • 1 a ce problème
  • 22 vues
  • Dernière réponse par DSGraham

more options

After upgrading to Thunderbird 91.2.1 (32 bit edition) second level subfolders with unread mail are initially not shown in bold (folder 'Alarms' in the second image). The number of unread emails in brackets *is* shown. After a minute or so (and unclear actions?) the folder with unread emails appears in bold (folder 'Alarms' in the third image). First level folders with unread emails *are* shown in bold (folder 'Google' in the first image).

After upgrading to Thunderbird 91.2.1 (32 bit edition) second level subfolders with unread mail are initially not shown in bold (folder 'Alarms' in the second image). The number of unread emails in brackets *is* shown. After a minute or so (and unclear actions?) the folder with unread emails appears in bold (folder 'Alarms' in the third image). First level folders with unread emails *are* shown in bold (folder 'Google' in the first image).
Captures d’écran jointes

Toutes les réponses (3)

more options
more options

Same problem -- new with 91.3, though; have never seen this before.

Top-level folder or account name is highlighted (bold) with number and down-arrow. Subfolder shows number in brackets, but is not highlighted.

Happens only with incoming messages -- and only if folder/account is not expanded when mail is retrieved.

If the account name is expanded when mail arrives, the top-level folder does get highlighted (but not any subfolders).

If the top-level folder is not expanded when mail arrives, the subfolders do not get highlighted.

more options

Hello, I have this problem, too. Win10 21H1 Home, Tbird 91.3.1 64 bit. First notice when I upgraded to 91.3.0 from {whatever I was running before. . . . }. OP perfectly describes what I see.