Mozilla 도움말 검색

고객 지원 사기를 피하세요. 저희는 여러분께 절대로 전화를 걸거나 문자를 보내거나 개인 정보를 공유하도록 요청하지 않습니다. "악용 사례 신고"옵션을 사용하여 의심스러운 활동을 신고해 주세요.

자세히 살펴보기

Thunderbird keeps marking e-mail as Junk

  • 21 답장
  • 15 이 문제를 만남
  • 19 보기
  • 최종 답변자: bigfootnlc

more options

I have TB 45.1.1 (on Arch Linux) with a Yahoo! IMAP e-mail account.

Spam is automatically marked as Junk and moved to the Junk folder.

Sometimes I have the following problems:

1. Messages are automatically marked as Junk although it's sender is in my Thunderbird address book.

2. When I remove the message from the Junk folder, marking it as "No Junk", it appears in the Inbox folder. (That's right.)

3. After a few seconds, the message is automaically marked as Junk again (but stays in the Inbox).

4. Thunderbird keeps marking the message as Junk.

I noticed that Thunderbird does not keep marking the message as Junk when in offline mode. It looks like the Junk status online at Yahoo! is not updated. However, when I look up online at yahoo.com, there is no sign of a positive Junk status. I still have the option to mark the message as Junk.

Any ideas?

I have TB 45.1.1 (on Arch Linux) with a Yahoo! IMAP e-mail account. Spam is automatically marked as Junk and moved to the Junk folder. Sometimes I have the following problems: 1. Messages are automatically marked as Junk although it's sender is in my Thunderbird address book. 2. When I remove the message from the Junk folder, marking it as "No Junk", it appears in the Inbox folder. (That's right.) 3. After a few seconds, the message is automaically marked as Junk again (but stays in the Inbox). 4. Thunderbird keeps marking the message as Junk. I noticed that Thunderbird does not keep marking the message as Junk when in offline mode. It looks like the Junk status online at Yahoo! is not updated. However, when I look up online at yahoo.com, there is no sign of a positive Junk status. I still have the option to mark the message as Junk. Any ideas?

글쓴이 nurfz 수정일시

모든 댓글 (1)

more options

Greetings:

Interesting! So far, it's worked as expected for me.

I'm not certain how to explain the differences.


Neil

  1. 1
  2. 2