Vyhľadajte odpoveď

Vyhnite sa podvodom s podporou. Nikdy vás nebudeme žiadať, aby ste zavolali alebo poslali SMS na telefónne číslo alebo zdieľali osobné informácie. Nahláste prosím podozrivú aktivitu použitím voľby “Nahlásiť zneužitie”.

Ďalšie informácie

【Feature Request】Consider adding "SM4”

more options

For more: SM2 by ISO SM2 by ISO.

Advantages in brief:

1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).

2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.

3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.

4. Free to the public.

5. Safe in use.

For more: [https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-14.html SM2 by ISO] SM2 by ISO. Advantages in brief: 1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits). 2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC. 3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other. 4. Free to the public. 5. Safe in use.

Všetky odpovede (1)

more options

Where to change the topic? In fact, SM2/3/4/9 are passed by ISO and the other related orgs.

Pomohla vám táto odpoveď?

Položiť otázku

Ak chcete odpovedať na príspevky, musíte sa prihlásiť do svojho účtu. Ak ešte nemáte účet, položte novú otázku.