Unable to show iCloud contact photos
When Thunderbird is set to synchronize from an iCloud contact CardDAV, it is unable to show the photos for the contact. I am using TB 115 on Windows (problem is platform independent).
Steps to reproduce
- Have an Apple ID. Use iCloud contact's web UI to create a contact and upload a photo for them.
- Get an app password for the Apple ID.
- Add iCloud contact as a CardDAV address book in TB. Should use https://contacts.icloud.com/contacts/ as the carddav location. The actual carddav URL I got is something like https://p123-contacts.icloud.com/12345678901/carddavhome/card/. (not a real link)
- Sync the address book. The photo would not display correctly.
My investigation
Apple's carddav API server returns in its vcard a HTTP URL as its PHOTO field, like:
PHOTO;VALUE=URI:https://gateway.icloud.com/contacts/12345678901/ck/card/123 456789abcd12345678abcd1234567
(not a real url; you can export the vcard if you have done the above reproducing steps)
However, this URL cannot be directly accessed (would return 401 saying "Missing X-APPLE-WEBAUTH-USER cookie"; see e.g. this github issue). However, the cookie is not really needed; I can use HTTP basic auth with the same credential for the carddav server (in this case it's the apple app password, yourappleid@apple.com:1234-abcd-5678-dcba
).
Potential fix
The current implementation directly puts the carddav photo URI into an HTML img tag. I think Thunderbird can make an AJAX request to fetch the image with the credentials and then put the result into an img tag.
Ezalaki modifié
All Replies (3)
Have you considered filing a bug? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/home
I really don't think anything useful will be achieved in a peer support forum.
Matt said
Have you considered filing a bug? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/home I really don't think anything useful will be achieved in a peer support forum.
Filed as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1874805. Do I need to mark this as solved?
It is not really solved, but marking topics solved allows them to be indexed by search engines. I would mark it as such for that reason. But I will leave it to you.