搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Don't loading extra big sprite images (width=57600px)

  • 3 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 6 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 cor-el

more options

I use extra big image as frame sequence for animation (sprite image). The image's width is 57600 px, height = 160px, weight = 1.85 mb. All modern browsers can load and show this image, but Firefox can't. FF also can't show the image by direct url to file.

image demo: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgtest.htm image source url: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgs/sphere3.jpg

Live demo complete project where used this images for animation: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/

FF Console says: "Syntax Error Image corrupt or truncated: ... Components is not defined"

also in FF javascript IMG .complete says "true" O_o

Please could anyone help me to fix it or explain why it's going so.

I use extra big image as frame sequence for animation (sprite image). The image's width is 57600 px, height = 160px, weight = 1.85 mb. All modern browsers can load and show this image, but Firefox can't. FF also can't show the image by direct url to file. image demo: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgtest.htm image source url: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/imgs/sphere3.jpg Live demo complete project where used this images for animation: http://e-nicko.ru/projects/magicwalls/ FF Console says: "Syntax Error Image corrupt or truncated: ... Components is not defined" also in FF javascript IMG .complete says "true" O_o Please could anyone help me to fix it or explain why it's going so.

所有回复 (3)

more options

On Windows, Firefox 4 and later traditionally has failed on images larger than 32,766 pixels in any direction. You're not the first person to find this annoying: https://support.mozilla.org/search?a=1&w=2&q=32,766.

I'm not sure when this might get fixed...

more options

Ow, got it. Thank you for your kind reply.

Hope it will be fixed in future FF updates...

more options

I'm not sure if it is that issue. On Linux this would normally work, but it shows a white image. Interesting is that Firefox 3.6 shows the first part of the image, but with wrong colors.

Maybe it is worth to file a bug about this issue.