搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Changing config settings to set Threads Pane default sort order not working

  • 4 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 14 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Fat Tony

more options

I followed this guide to set config settings for sorting the Threads Pane:

https://superuser.com/questions/13518/change-the-default-sorting-order-in-thunderbird

This is the updated list of values:

Preference Name Status Type Value mailnews.default_news_sort_order: default integer 2 mailnews.default_news_sort_type: default integer 18 mailnews.default_sort_order: default integer 2 mailnews.default_sort_type: default integer 18

But, this does not work. I think that Super User post is outdated. How can I make this work? Thanks.

I'm using Thunderbird 68.8.0 (32-bit).

I followed this guide to set config settings for sorting the Threads Pane: https://superuser.com/questions/13518/change-the-default-sorting-order-in-thunderbird This is the updated list of values: '''Preference Name Status Type Value''' mailnews.default_news_sort_order: default integer 2 mailnews.default_news_sort_type: default integer 18 mailnews.default_sort_order: default integer 2 mailnews.default_sort_type: default integer 18 But, this does not work. I think that Super User post is outdated. How can I make this work? Thanks. I'm using Thunderbird 68.8.0 (32-bit).

所有回复 (4)

more options

My preferences are exactly as you describe. This means my default sort order is descending and sort type is Date, so all newest emails by date are at the top.

Obviously this does not apply to threaded emails, only the first email that started the thread would be in date order. All subsequent replies/conversations within a thread would be shown as newest as last received in that thread as they are an appended conversation to an earlier email.

What is the current problem?

What are you trying to achieve ?

more options

If you want the default to also be 'threaded' : In config editor type: view_flags

Look for these lines:

  • mailnews.default_news_view_flags
  • mailnews.default_view_flags
  • Double click on each line to access edit window.
  • Enter the value 1 and click on OK.

The Value 0 means unthreaded.

more options

Toad-Hall said

My preferences are exactly as you describe. This means my default sort order is descending and sort type is Date, so all newest emails by date are at the top. Obviously this does not apply to threaded emails, only the first email that started the thread would be in date order. All subsequent replies/conversations within a thread would be shown as newest as last received in that thread as they are an appended conversation to an earlier email. What is the current problem? What are you trying to achieve ?

Hi Toad-Hall. I'm just trying to sort the Threads Pane by Date in an descending order. I think it is actually working now as I probably had to restart TB. You are right about the unusual sorting order of individual replies within a thread.

Edit: I spoke too soon. Actually these config settings are not sticking for new folder selections.

Toad-Hall said

If you want the default to also be 'threaded' : In config editor type: view_flags Look for these lines:
  • mailnews.default_news_view_flags
  • mailnews.default_view_flags
  • Double click on each line to access edit window.
  • Enter the value 1 and click on OK.
The Value 0 means unthreaded.

Nice! Is there a config setting to display threads expanded by default? I set View > Threads > Expand All Threads but it doesn't seem to stick when reselecting a target folder.

由Fat Tony于修改

more options

Toad-Hall said

My preferences are exactly as you describe. This means my default sort order is descending and sort type is Date, so all newest emails by date are at the top. Obviously this does not apply to threaded emails, only the first email that started the thread would be in date order. All subsequent replies/conversations within a thread would be shown as newest as last received in that thread as they are an appended conversation to an earlier email. What is the current problem? What are you trying to achieve ?

This is not working still.